|
Titre :
|
In Defense of Food Curriculum: A Mixed Methods Outcome Evaluation in Afterschool (2019)
|
|
Auteurs :
|
Hiershenee B. Luesse, Auteur ;
Joseph E. Luesse, Auteur ;
Jordan Lawson, Auteur
|
|
Type de document :
|
Article : texte imprimé
|
|
Dans :
|
Health Education & Behavior (Vol. 46, n°4, Août 2019)
|
|
Article en page(s) :
|
pp. 612–625
|
|
Langues :
|
Anglais
|
|
Catégories :
|
ADOLESCENT
EDUCATION POUR LA SANTE
ALIMENTATION
EVALUATION
CHANGEMENT DE COMPORTEMENT
PROGRAMME
|
|
Résumé :
|
Background. Highly processed foods are inexpensive and abundant in our food supply, nutritionally poor, and disproportionately marketed to minority youth. This study is part of a curriculum development project to develop, implement, and evaluate the In Defense of Food (IDOF) curriculum designed to increase intake of whole/minimally processed foods and decrease intake of highly processed foods in youth. Aims. This pilot outcome evaluation was undertaken to assess initial effectiveness and to provide an in-depth understanding of changes in behavioral outcomes and psychosocial mediators. Methods. We used an explanatory mixed method approach, including a single-arm pretest–posttest of intervention effect, followed by a food rules assessment and in-depth interviews to describe participant responses to the intervention in more detail. The study was conducted in three afterschool classrooms in urban low-income neighborhoods with 32 multiethnic middle-school youth, receiving 10 weekly 2-hour sessions. Results. Two weeks postintervention, there was a large positive significant increase in whole/minimally processed food intake (p
|
|
Catalogueur :
|
RESOdoc
|
|
En ligne :
|
https://sites.uclouvain.be/reso/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=992833
|
